🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to pull out from an global treaty designed to protect females from violence, including family violence, following prolonged and intense debates in the parliament.

Thousands of protesters gathered in the capital this past week to voice disagreement with the vote. The ultimate authority now rests with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to approve or reject the proposed law.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, requiring governments to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to end all types of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the initial European Union member to initiate the procedure of exiting from the treaty. Turkey pulled out in 2021, a move that human rights organizations characterized as a major regression for women's rights.

Political Controversy and Opposition

The treaty was ratified by the European Union in last year, yet conservative groups have contended that its emphasis on gender equality weakens family values and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Saeima, lawmakers voted 56 to 32 to withdraw from the convention, a move sponsored by opposition parties but backed by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a setback for moderate conservative Prime Minister the nation's PM, who stood with demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse does not triumph," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Reactions

One of the primary parties advocating for the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose leader has urged citizens to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official appealed for the treaty not to be politicized, while the organization the rights organization asserted it was "not a danger to national principles, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The Thursday's vote has sparked broad protest both within Latvia and internationally.

22,000 people have endorsed a Latvian appeal calling for the treaty to be maintained. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has announced a demonstration for the coming week, charging MPs of ignoring the wishes of the Latvian people.

Global Concerns and Possible Next Steps

The leader of the European organization's parliamentary assembly stated that Latvia had made a hasty decision fueled by false information. He described it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning regression for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the convention four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not secure a two-thirds majority, the president could potentially return the legislation for additional consideration if he holds concerns.

Head of State the national leader announced on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account state and legal considerations, rather than ideological or political perspectives".

Recently, another member of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a worrisome development for gender equality not only in our nation but throughout the continent," commented a human rights activist.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in multiple European nations
• The European treaty requires specific safeguards for survivors of domestic abuse
• Latvia's decision could affect comparable discussions in additional member states