🔗 Share this article

Internationally, states are pouring hundreds of billions into the concept of “sovereign AI” – developing national AI systems. From Singapore to Malaysia and Switzerland, states are vying to build AI that grasps local languages and local customs.

The Worldwide AI Battle

This trend is part of a larger worldwide contest spearheaded by large firms from the US and China. While firms like OpenAI and a social media giant allocate enormous resources, mid-sized nations are likewise taking their own investments in the AI landscape.

However amid such vast amounts involved, is it possible for less wealthy nations achieve notable advantages? According to a specialist from a well-known thinktank, Except if you’re a affluent state or a big company, it’s a significant hardship to create an LLM from nothing.”

Defence Concerns

A lot of states are reluctant to depend on foreign AI models. In India, for instance, US-built AI solutions have at times proven inadequate. An illustrative example featured an AI tool employed to teach learners in a remote community – it interacted in English with a pronounced Western inflection that was hard to understand for local users.

Then there’s the state security factor. In the Indian defence ministry, relying on certain international systems is viewed not permissible. According to a developer noted, It's possible it contains some arbitrary learning material that might say that, such as, Ladakh is separate from India … Employing that specific system in a defence setup is a big no-no.”

He added, “I have spoken to experts who are in security. They wish to use AI, but, setting aside particular tools, they don’t even want to rely on Western systems because data might go overseas, and that is totally inappropriate with them.”

National Initiatives

Consequently, several nations are backing domestic initiatives. An example such initiative is being developed in the Indian market, wherein a company is attempting to develop a national LLM with state support. This project has committed approximately $1.25bn to AI development.

The developer foresees a system that is less resource-intensive than premier systems from Western and Eastern tech companies. He states that India will have to compensate for the financial disparity with talent. Based in India, we don’t have the luxury of pouring huge sums into it,” he says. “How do we vie against for example the enormous investments that the America is pumping in? I think that is the point at which the core expertise and the brain game comes in.”

Local Focus

In Singapore, a government initiative is backing AI systems developed in local native tongues. These tongues – such as the Malay language, Thai, Lao, Indonesian, Khmer and additional ones – are commonly poorly represented in American and Asian LLMs.

I hope the individuals who are building these national AI tools were conscious of how rapidly and how quickly the leading edge is moving.

A senior director engaged in the project notes that these tools are designed to complement larger models, rather than substituting them. Systems such as a popular AI tool and Gemini, he states, often struggle with regional languages and culture – interacting in stilted the Khmer language, as an example, or recommending meat-containing dishes to Malay users.

Developing regional-language LLMs allows local governments to incorporate cultural sensitivity – and at least be “knowledgeable adopters” of a sophisticated tool developed elsewhere.

He adds, I am cautious with the term sovereign. I think what we’re aiming to convey is we aim to be better represented and we want to grasp the capabilities” of AI platforms.

Multinational Partnership

For states trying to carve out a role in an escalating global market, there’s a different approach: join forces. Researchers affiliated with a well-known university put forward a state-owned AI venture shared among a group of middle-income states.

They refer to the project “Airbus for AI”, in reference to Europe’s productive strategy to build a competitor to Boeing in the 1960s. Their proposal would see the creation of a state-backed AI entity that would combine the capabilities of different states’ AI projects – including the United Kingdom, Spain, the Canadian government, Germany, Japan, Singapore, the Republic of Korea, France, Switzerland and Sweden – to create a competitive rival to the Western and Eastern leaders.

The lead author of a report describing the initiative says that the idea has gained the consideration of AI leaders of at least a few states so far, along with multiple national AI firms. Although it is presently centered on “mid-sized nations”, less wealthy nations – Mongolia and the Republic of Rwanda included – have additionally shown curiosity.

He elaborates, Currently, I think it’s just a fact there’s diminished faith in the promises of the present US administration. People are asking for example, is it safe to rely on these technologies? In case they opt to